Agarwal, A; Panner, SMK and Ambar, RF (2021). Validation of LensHooke® X1 PRO and computer-assisted semen analyzer compared with laboratory-based manual semen analysis. World J. Mens Health. 39: 496-505.
Arokia, R; Ganapathy, J; Pawshe, M; Tamilmani, T and Mayilsamy, S (2016). Collection and evaluation of canine semen-A review. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol., 5: 1586-1595.
Belala, R; Bourahmoune, D and Mimoune, N (2024). The use of computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA) in domestic animal reproduction: A review. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 30: 741-751.
Belala, R; Kebbal, S; Bouguetof, C; Medjkoune, M; Mecherouk, C and Mimoune, N (2025a). Morphometric parameters of canine spermatozoa: Comparison between conventional microscopy and CASA system. Med. Weter, 81: 23-31.
Belala, R; Kebbal, S; Medjkoune, M; Tahlout, M; Haffad, Y; Slamani, Y and Mimoune, N (2025b). Canine sperm concentration: comparison between Neubauer cell counting, photometers and a CASA system. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 60: e70104.
Belala, R; Medjkoune, M; Mecherouk, C and Mimoune, N (2025c). Evaluation of soybean lecithin-based extenders in canine semen cryopreservation. Vet. Arhiv., 95: 295-306.
Brito, LFC; Althouse, GC; Aurich, C; Chenoweth, PJ; Eilts, BE; Love, CC; Luvoni, GC; Mitchell, JR; Peter, AT; Pugh, DG and Waberski, D (2016). Andrology laboratory review: Evaluation of sperm concentration. Theriogenology. 85: 1507-1527.
Bulkeley, E; Christine, C; Azarene, F; Kris, G; Heather, P and Stuart, M (2021). Assessment of an iPad-based sperm motility analyzer for determination of canine sperm motility. Transl. Anim. Sci., 5: txab066.
Domoslawska, A; Zdunczyk, S; Nizanski, W and Janowski, T (2013). Assessment of semen quality in infertile dogs using computer assisted sperm analysis by the Hamilton-Thorne Semen Analyser. Bull.Vet. Inst. Pulawy. 57: 429-432.
Hussein, RS; Mohamed, EEM; Mohamed, RR; Abdelbasset, WK; Morsy, WE and Elsayed, SH (2024). Assessment of Sperm Morphometry in Evaluating Male Infertility. Int. J. Biomed., 14: 93-98.
Iguer-Ouada, M and Verstegen, J (2001). Evaluation of the Hamilthon-Thorn computer-based automated system for dog semen analysis. Theriogenology. 55: 733-749.
Jorge-Neto, PN; Araújo, GR; Silva, MCC; Salomao-Jr, JA; Csermak-Jr, AC and Pizutto, CS (2020). Description of the CASA system configuration setup for jaguar (Panthera onca). Anim. Reprod. Sci., 220: 40-41.
Jorge Neto, PN; Francisco, F; Carneiro, MD; Santos, S; Requena, L; Dressel, RS; Goés, M; Valle, R; Padilha, F; Colbachini, H; Gutierrez, R; Schneider Brandão Souza, L; Manoel, V; Reisfeld, L; Deco-Souza, T; Leite, R and Pizzutto, C (2024). Specific setup and methodology for computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) in evaluating elasmobranch sperm. Theriogenology Wild. 4: 100091.
Lammers, J; Splingart, C; Barriere, P; Jean, M and Freour, T (2014). Doubleblind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 31: 35-43.
Mazzuchini, M; Novello, G and Segabinazzi, L (2024). Modified diff-quick staining for canine sperm morphology. CT. 16. 10.58292/ct.v16.10243.
Meena, AK and Manchiwal, PK (2023). Collection and evaluation of dog semen: A mini review. Pharma Innovation. 12: 1277-1282.
Milovanov, VK (1962). The biology of reproduction and the artificial insemination of animals. Seljhozgiz, Moscow. P: 969. (in Russian)
Mortimer, ST; van der Horst, G and Mortimer, D (2015). The future of computer-aided sperm analysis. Asian J. Androl., 17: 545-553.
O’Meara, C; Henrotte, E; Kupisiewicz, K; Latour, C; Broekhuijse, M; Camus, A; Gavin-Plagne, L and Sellem, E (2022). The effect of adjusting settings within a Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) system on bovine sperm motility and morphology results. Anim. Reprod., 19: e20210077.
Önder, NT; Gökdemir, T; Kılıç, MC; Şahin, O; Yıldız, S; Kaçar, C; Demir, MC and Öztürkler, Y (2023). Insulin and bull sperm interactions during cryopreservation. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 29: 401-405.
Rijsselaere, T; Soom, AV; Maes, D and De Kruif, A (2003). Effect of technical settings on canine motility parameters measured by Hamilton-Thorne analyzer. Theriogenology. 60: 1553-1568.
Rijsselaere, T; Soom, A; Maes, D and Niżański, W (2012). Computer-Assisted sperm analysis in dogs and cats: An update after 20 years. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 6: 204-207.
Rijsselaere, T; Van Soom, A; Maes, D; Verberckmoes, S and De Kruif, A (2004). Effect of blood admixture on in vitro survival of chilled and frozen-thawed canine spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 61: 1589-1602.
Rijsselaere, T; Van Soom, A; Tanghe, S; Coryn, M; Maes, D and de Kruif, A (2005). New techniques for the assessment of canine semen quality: A review. Theriogenology. 64: 706-719.
Schubert, B; Badiou, M and Force, A (2019). Computer-aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment. Andrologia. 51: e13417.
Şengül, E; Dayanıklı, C; Alpcan Künyeli, B; Çoban, İ; Bülbül, B; Üstüner, B and Nur, Z (2024). Effect of equex on ram semen in different freezing extenders. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 30: 207-214.
Tanga, BM; Qamar, AY; Raza, S; Bang, S; Fang, X; Yoon, K and Cho, J (2021). Semen evaluation: methodological advancements in sperm quality-specific fertility assessment - A review. Anim. Biosci., 34: 1253-1270.
Van der Horst, G and du Plessis, S (2017). Not just the marriage of Figaro: but the marriage of WHO/ESHRE semen analysis criteria with sperm functionality. Post. Androl. Online. 4: 6-21.
Van der Horst, G; Du Plessis, S and Maree, L (2021). Have we conquered sperm morphology analysis in different mammalian species as analysed by CASMA? XIIIth International Symposium on Spermatology, n. pag.10.1007/ 978-3-030-66292-9_38.
WHO (2010). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th Edn., World Health Organization. PP: 7-164. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/ 44261.
WHO (2021). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 6th Edn., Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. PP: 9-246.
Yurdakök-Dikmen, B; Tekin, K; Tırpan, MB; Daşkın, A and Filazi, A (2017). In vitro toxicity of some pesticides on goat and dog spermatozoa. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 23: 297-303.
Zhang, M; Gu, L; Zheng, P; Chen, Z; Dou, X; Qin, Q and Cai, X (2020). Improvement of cell counting method for Neubauer counting chamber. J. Clin. Lab. Anal., 34: e23024.
)