Adams, D (2023). Disruptive’ science more likely from teams who work in the same place. Nature. 624: 20.
Kozlov, M (2023). ‘Disruptive’ science has declined-and no one knows why. Nature. 613: 225.
Licitra, L; Keilholz, U; Tahara, M; Lin, J; Chomette, P; Ceruse, P and Mesia, R (2016). Evaluation of the benefit and use of multidisciplinary teams in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol., 59: 73-79.
Park, M; Leahey, E and Funk, RJ (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature. 613: 138-144.
Porter, A and Rafols, I (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics. 81: 719-745.
Rawat, S and Meena, S (2014). Publish or perish: Where are we heading? J. Res. Med. Sci., 19: 87-89.
Rylance, R (2015). Grant giving: Global funders to focus on interdisciplinarity. Nature. 525: 313-315.
Taberna, M; Gil Moncayo, F; Jané-Salas, E; Antonio, M; Arribas, L; Vilajosana, E and Mesía, R (2020). The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and quality of care. Front. Oncol., 10: 1-4.
Van Noorden, R (2015). Interdisciplinary research by the numbers. Nature. 525: 306-307.
)