A fluorescence polarization assay using recombinant protein ESAT-6 for the detection of antibodies against pathogenic Mycobacterium bovis in bovine

Document Type : Full paper (Original article)

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science (COVS), Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (GADVASU), Ludhiana, Punjab, India

2 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science (COVS), Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (GADVASU), Ludhiana, Punjab, India

3 Animal Disease Research Centre (ADRC), College of Veterinary Science (COVS), Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (GADVASU), Ludhiana, Punjab, India

4 Directorate of Livestock Farms, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (GADVASU), Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Abstract

Background: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a major bacterial disease that causes significant economic disruption across the globe. Aims: Our study was based on using a fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) that used fluorescein-labeled ESAT-6 protein to detect Mycobacterium bovis antibodies in bovine serum. Methods: The ESAT-6 protein was used in a FPA. Positive TB reactors were determined by the comparative intradermal test (CID) and interferon gamma test (IFN-γ). Antibodies against M. bovis were detected using a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labeled tracer and a whole culture FITC labeled tracer in the positive cattle. Results: Of the 192 animals tested for bTB, 37 were found to be positive by either the CID or IFN-γ assays. Using the mP values from five culture-positive serum samples, a cutoff value of more than >127 mp provided the best discrimination between positive reactors and negative bTB animals. The ESAT-6 results of FPA in comparison with CID results revealed sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 64.6%, and in comparison with results IFN-γ, showed sensitivity of 95.7% and specificity of 49%. FPA using FITC labelled ESAT-6 as a tracer has better sensitivity (95.7%) and specificity (49.1%) than IFN-γ test in humoral immune response in animals. Conclusion: This work revealed that the ESAT-6 protein as an antigen can be used in diagnosing bTB using a practical and sensitive humoral test.

Keywords


Aranaz, A (2006). Assessment of diagnostic tools for eradication of bovine tuberculosis in cattle co-infected with Mycobacterium bovis and M. avium subsp. para-tuberculosis. Vet. Res., 37: 593-606.
Buddle, BM (1999). Differentiation between Mycobacterium bovis BCG-vaccinated and M. bovis-infected cattle by using recombinant mycobacterial antigens. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol., 6: 1-5.
Collins, DM; Radford, AJ; de Lisle, GW and Jacob, HB (1994). Diagnosis and epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis using molecular biological approaches. Vet. Microbiol., 40: 83-94.
Costello, E; Egan, JW; Quigley, FC and O’Reilly, PF (1997). Performance of the single intradermal comparative tuberculin test in identifying cattle with tuberculous lesions in Irish herds. Vet. Rec., 141: 222-224.
Francis, J (1958). Tuberculosis in animals and man. London, Cassell & Co. Ltd., P: 357.
Gutiérrez, M; Tellechea, J and García, MJF (1998). Evaluation of cellular and serological diagnostic tests for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis-infected goats. Vet. Microbiol., 62: 281-290.
Hanna, J; Neill, SD and O’Brien, JJ (1989). Use of PPD and phosphatide antigens in an ELISA to detect the serological response in experimental bovine tuberculosis. Res. Vet. Sci., 47: 43-47.
Harboe, M (1990). Protein G-based enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay for anti-MPB70 antibodies in bovine tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol., 28: 913-921.
Harboe, M; Oettinger, T; Wiker, HG; Rosenkrands, I and Andersen, P (1996). Evidence for occurrence of the ESAT-6 protein in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and virulent Mycobacterium bovis and for its absence in Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect. Immun., 64: 16-22.
Harboe, MHG; Wiker, JRD; Garcia, MM; Dukes, TW; Brooks, BW; Turcotte, C and Nagai, S (1990). Protein G-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-MPB70 antibodies in bovine tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol., 28: 913-921.
Jolley, ME; Nasir, MS; Surujballi, OP; Romanowska, A; Renteria, TB; De La Mora, A; Lim, A; Bolin, SR; Michel, AL; Kostovic, M and Corrigan, EC (2007). Fluorescence polarization assay for the detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium bovis in bovine sera. Vet. Microbiol., 120: 113-121.
Kerry, AM; Sarah, MF and Jeffrey, L (2011). Rv3615c is a highly immunodominant RD1 (Region of Difference 1)-dependent secreted antigen specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. PNAS. 108: 5731-5732.
Kohler, H (2001). Immune reactions in cattle after immunization with a Mycobacterium paratuberculosis vaccine and implications for the diagnosis of M. paratuberculosis and M. bovis infections. J. Vet. Med. Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health. 48: 185-195.
Lepper, AWD; Pearson, CW and Corner, LA (1977). Anergy to tuberculin in beef cattle. Aus. Vet. J., 53: 214-216.
Lin, M; Sugden, EA; Jolley, ME and Stilwell, K (1996). Modification of the Mycobacterium bovis extracellular protein MPB70 with fluorescein for rapid detection of specific serum antibodies by fluorescence polarization. Clin. Diagno. Lab Immunol., 3: 438-443.
Mihret, A; Bekele, Y; Bobosha, K; Kidd, M; Aseffa, A; Howe, R and Walzl, G (2013). Plasma cytokines and chemokines differentiate between active disease and non-active tuberculosis infection. J. Infect. Immunol., 66: 357-365.
Mirsky, ML; Morton, D; Piehl, JW and Gelberg, H (1992). Mycobacterium bovis infection in a captive herd of Sika deer. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 200: 1540-1542.
Monaghan, ML; Doherty, ML; Collins, JD; Kazda, JF and Quinn, PJ (1994). The tuberculin test. Vet. Microbiol., 40: 111-124.
Neill, SD; Cassidy, J; Hanna, J; Mackie, DP; Pollock Clements, A; Walton, E and Bryson, DG994). Detection of Mycobacterium bovis infectionin skin test-negative cattle with an assay for bovine interferon-gamma. Vet. Rec., 135: 134-135.
OIE (1992). Terrestrial Manual. Bovine tuberculosis. PP: 287-296.
OIE (Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals) (2009). OIE Terrestrial Manual 2008; World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris, France.
Pollock, JM; Welsh, MD and McNair, J (2005). Immune responses in bovine tuberculosis: Towards new strategies
for the diagnosis and control of disease. Vet. Immunol. Immunopath., 108: 37-43.
Radostits, OM; Gay, CC; Hinchcliff, KW and Constable, PD (2010). Veterinary medicine. 10th Edn., USA, W. B. Saunders Co., P: 1009.
Ritacco, V; Lopez, B; Barrera, L; Nader, A; Fliess, E and de Kantor, IN (1990). Further evaluation of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Zentbl. Veterinaermed. B., 37: 19-27.
Rua-Domenech, R; Goodchild, AT; Vordermeier, HM; Hewinson, RG; Christiansen, KH and Clifton-Hadley, RS (2006). Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle. A review of the tuberculin tests, gamma-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res. Vet. Sci., 81: 190-210.
Schiller, I; Oesch, B; Vordermeier, HM; Palmer, MV; Harris, BN; Orloski, KA; Buddle, BM; Thacker, TC; Lyashchenko, KP and Waters, WR (2010). Bovine tuberculosis: a review of current and emerging diagnostic techniques in view of their relevance for disease control and eradication. Transbound. Emerg. Dis., 57: 205-220.
Surujballi, OP; Romanowska, A; Sugden, EA; Turcotte, C and Jolley, ME (2002). A fluorescence polarization assay for the detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium bovis in cattle sera. Vet. Microbiol., 87: 149-157.
Vordermeier, HM (1999). Development of diagnostic reagents to differentiate between Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination and M. bovis infection in cattle. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol., 6: 675-682.
Wood, PR (1991). Field comparison of the interferon-gamma assay and the intra-dermal tuberculin test for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Aust. Vet. J., 68: 286-290.